Saturday, December 26, 2009

Barack Married Michelle to Make Him Appear More Black


This man is not your typical Don't-Treat-On-Me-912 guy. He seems to be more of a harmless kook than anything else. Now, he writes a column for Examiner.com, which doesn't mean his mental state is not shaky, only that he's dedicated to what he's doing. There are many dedicated crazies out there, you know, and Examiner.com will let you in without too many journalistic credentials. Or editing. Or spell checking.

So Clifford Bryan, who writes the Michelle Obama column for Examiner.com, wrote about the Obamas' marriage. Is it a marriage of convenience?
Would part of the deal be that Michelle Obama, we don't know how to say this any other way, but would part of the deal be that the First Lady would teach Barack how to be more black ? In return they would share a once in a life time experience. Is the marriage part of brand Obama ?

Fine. Hooray for Citizen Journalism. Hooray for extra spaces before question marks.

But you know the crazies are going to start quoting him now. It's a legitimate article, after all! It came from Examiner.com!

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Best Twitter Update of All Time?

dictoinary

The End.

Friday, December 11, 2009

The Only Answer is WAR


See, there's nothing wrong with citizens who keep an eye on the government. This country was based on freedom from tyranny, after all. And isn't the Bill of Rights a list of ways we can all fight back if our government becomes a tyrannical Dictatorship?

Still, if (and when) Obama unleashes his Communist agenda to try and destroy the country because he was brainwashed by Saul Alinsky and anyway, he's not even American, so what does he care? If and when that happens, I'll still take my chances with the Comrades rather than fight alongside these clowns.

Now, I said I don't go looking for extremists who see themselves as such, and this site is no different. They see themselves as moderates, as long as the government isn't coming for them.

They say, for example, that they "do not advocate the violent overthrow of the United States Government." Unless, you know, it's called for.

Here's a recent forum thread: "OCCUPIED AMERICA!"

As it is NOW painfully obvious a Government, By, For and of the People, has been taken over be an Oligarchy of International Socialists and corporate Fascists who are operating ENTIRELY without regards for the Peoples wishes and best interests and therefore should not be supported in any way! Giving info,or paying taxes should be seen as aiding and abetting the Enemys of this formerly great nation and should be stopped at once if you are still doing so!

Not paying taxes? That's so Pre-Obama. Here are some of the comments:

There's only one answer any longer. Only one.

The only answer is war, do you mean?

At least I think so, though I don't push this idea on anyone.

Look, we all love our country that used to be here, we all love the Constitution of the United States. We abide by it, we will not make ourselves into a domestic enemy of the people, but when the people are no longer in charge of their Government, then that is a serious change in the situation.

Guys like Glenn Beck will tout the principles of the founding fathers and his groups, founded on the 912 principles, have sprung up all over America and number in the millions of people even as I write this. Glenn also advocates a peaceful, non violent solution, but he does so while quoting the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

No government, anywhere, in any point in distant or recent history actually went from corrupt to un-corrupt all by themselves. It always took a war, a bloody fight in which the tree of liberty was watered back to health by the blood of patriots. When it happens, it happens. I see this as inevitable as our current masters won't allow for peaceful revolution.

A Well Regulated Militia

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Is the Conservative Attack on Mike Huckabee Justified?

Was Huckabee right to grant clemency to Maurice Clemmons, a young offender who grew up inside the criminal justice system, who really only needed someone to give him a second chance? Or was Huckabee too eager to release a violent man because that violent man said he had turned his life around and returned to his good Christian roots?

The facts make it clear: Clemmons, who was shot after killing four officers, didn't need a second chance--he needed to stay in jail. But is that enough to destroy Huckabee's political ambitions? After all, Huckabee had to make a tough decision here, and at the risk of endangering the community, he decided to see the potential good in Maurice Clemmons and give him that second chance.

Which would have been the case if not for these two letters. Without these two letters, the attack by Conservatives would have seemed like yet another Litmus Test attack Conservatives have been in the habit of launching recently. But seeing these two letters, one by an Arkansas Prosecutor asking Huckabee to re-evaluate his clemency procedures, and the other back to the Prosecutor from Huckabee's office, I have to agree with the Free Republic crowd. This is not simply an attack on a Governor who now seems not Conservative enough. This is an attack on someone who should stick to what he knows: bass guitar.


Letter to Huckabee


Letter from Huckabee
Related Posts with Thumbnails